A) No sale of real estate on proxy: Supreme Court Property Sale by the current general proxy (AMP) practice will not confer any property rights on the buyer. In a pioneering decision aimed at shaken up a large number of homeowners, the Supreme Court found that the GPA method of selling real estate is not a valid form of property transfer. A three-judge bank chaired by Judge R. V. Raveendran stated that the property can only be legally transferred through registered sales laws. “A power of attorney is not an instrument of transfer in relation to a right, title or interest in a property,” the bank said after unraveling various provisions of the Property Sale Act. However, the bank stated that the verdict would not affect “actual transactions” under the GPA. Wednesday`s ruling would have implications for both real estate and rental properties and would have an impact on the way real estate is transferred to Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR), where GPA sales are very common. While it may cause some hardship to those who have already purchased real estate through the GPA, the order will help reduce tax evasion, put dirty money into real estate and prevent people from being deceived by unscrupulous landlords who sell the same property to several people.

Apartment sold by the owner to a third party if my agreement was valid for sale I had made a sales contract on an apartment in Agra U.P. on 02/11/2012, with a validity period of 15 months, after 15 months, the owner with a reciprocal agreement and reason that the construction work is not renewed for an additional 12 months until 28/01/2015, again with the same reason that they sought and extended by 6 more months of the agreement for the sale that was made and the sale agreement was extended until 22/07/2015. We then sent a message to the owner and in response to the notification the owner asked again until 10/15/2015.Afterward, a new notification was made on 17/10/2015 to execute the sales number, but the owner responded again by letter and requested the extension until 15.07.2016 with the same reason that the dwellings are incomplete. After 10/15/2016, the architect is nowhere to be found and was recently arrested for counterfeiting and is currently in prison. On request, I learned that the owner of my apartment, the valid agreement to sell to third parties with sale act of 28/06/2014. During this period, my contract for sale was valid, but now the owner is in jail, which is the remedy and the party who sold the deed occupied the apartment .now what is the lawyer me to recover my apartment. Section 53A in The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 1[53A. Partial benefit. which is already in possession, still partially executing the contract and has done some deed for the promotion of the contract, and the purchaser has executed his share of the contract or is ready to perform his part of the contract, so, regardless of the 2, if there is an instrument of transmission that has not been accomplished by the law for the timely entry into force or of a person appealing to it.

that the purchaser has taken possession or maintained, with the exception of a right expressly provided for by the terms of the contract, against the purchaser and persons who claim below him a right that the purchaser has not taken over Unless otherwise provided in this section does not affect the rights of a transfer to the counterparty who is not aware of the contract or partial benefit.] ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++